Washington – A federal judge in California on Monday ordered conservative attorney John Eastman to hand over a tranche of documents to the House of Representatives’ committee to investigate the U.S. Capitol attack on Jan. 6, and found that former President Donald Trump “faster than not” illegally tried to disrupt official elections. attack.
In his Solution on 44 pages Regarding the documents of Eastman, a former law professor at Chapman University who played a key role in Trump’s efforts to falsify the results of the 2020 presidential election, U.S. District Judge David Carter wrote that based on the evidence he believes it is “more likely than not, that President Trump corruptly tried to disrupt a joint session of Congress on January 6, 2021. ”
“Dr. Eastman and President Trump have launched a campaign to overturn democratic elections, an unprecedented action in American history,” he wrote. “Their campaign was not limited to the ivory tower – it was a coup in search of legal theory. The plan prompted violent attacks on the seat of the government of our country, led to the death of several law enforcement officers and deepened public distrust of our political process.
Eastmanwith the House election committee responding to a summons she sent to Chapman University for records, including emails related to the 2020 presidential election or the Jan. 6 attack.
Eastman, however, tried to hide the documents from investigators, arguing that they included information that would be protected in accordance with the privileges of counsel and the client and the privileges of counsel. He asked the federal district court to block the committee from complying with his summons and prevent Chapman from complying with the demand.
In particular, the emails exchanged between January 4, 2021 and January 7, 2021 were in question, some of which Eastman tried to claim for privileges, allegations that were rejected by the committee.
Of the 111 documents from those dates that Eastman said should be protected from disclosure, Carter found that only 10 contained privileged information and therefore should be hidden. The remaining 101 are to be disclosed by the House of Representatives election committee, he said.
“The maximum of this case is a warning about the danger of” legal theories “that went wrong, powerful abuses of public platforms and despair to win at any cost,” he wrote. “If Dr. Eastman’s and President Trump’s plan worked, it would permanently halt the peaceful transfer of power, undermining American democracy and the Constitution.
The panel informed the court inas part of a dispute with Eastman that he had evidence that Trump and his allies were involved in a “criminal conspiracy” in an attempt to prevent Congress from approving the 2020 election results.